Applying to Law
School
A general information packet for interested juniors and
seniors
Introduction
As an undergraduate, you should not be overly
concerned with law school application until the second term of your
junior
year. Any real attention paid to it prior to that time is
probably
wasted energy and only anxiety-producing. Needless to say, some
attention
should be paid to your grades, which will be pretty well established by
the end of your junior year.
By that time, you should take stock of your general
qualifications for law school application. Foremost at that time would be
your overall grade average (GPA). As a general rule, you should maintain a
minimum overall grade average of 3.30 by the end of your first term in your
senior year to be eligible for at least second tier law schools, and your grades
over your junior and senior years should reflect a gradual increase rather
than a leveling off or gradual decline. A large number of students change majors
after their freshman or sophomore years produced mediocre grades, and their real
current performance abilities would be reflected
in their most recent semesters. Naturally, your score on the Law School
Admissions Test (LSAT, discussed below) is equally if not more important, and a
higher percentile scoring on the LSAT can in some circumstances compensate for
a lower overall GPA. But you should not count on that, especially if you have specific law
schools you are interested in. Students with an overall grade average below 3.30
will have to do very well on the LSAT to move into
consideration at many law schools and might well also consider alternative avenues of graduate study or career
directions, or look
into paralegal programs. Solid, reputable post-graduate paralegal programs, such
as the one offered by Duquesne, are also fairly competitive - a 3.00 GPA is about the minimum for applying
to those types of programs.
An overall GPA of 3.30 or above will place you into minimal
consideration only. Most competitive undergraduates have a GPA in the 3.50-3.70
range and have a fairly diversified academic background, having completed a dual
major, a minor, a certificate program, or a study abroad experience, and are
active in campus organizations However, a high GPA will get you nowhere if you
have mediocre score on the LSAT. A standard rule might be that a minimum of 50th percentile would be needed for
application to the least competitive law schools. Law schools in
Pennsylvania tend to require somewhat higher minimum than that - around the
65th-to-85th percentile.
Don't be fooled by rumors that despite poor
grades,
someone got into law school because he had 'pull.' Basically your
grades
and LSAT scores place you into consideration. If you don't have
the
minimum levels of either, it doesn't matter if you are class president,
dorm queen, or have a father on the Board. In fact, admissions
committees
tend to establish their minimum application thresholds over a period of years
as
a predictor of first-year law school performance. Granted, standardized
tests like the LSAT do not reveal the ‘whole person' or how one might respond to
the academic demands of first year law school, and that is why a number of law
schools
place greater marginal emphasis on grade performance and rigor of
course selection. All this should dissuade you from hoping that
a sudden and perhaps unexpectedly high LSAT score would overcome a
three years of modest grades. Truth be known, there is often a pretty
good correlation
between one's grade profile (assuming it reflects a range of rigorous courses) and one's LSAT score, and unless the LSAT scores is
fairly high, a law school
admissions
committee is unlikely to give more consideration to grade performance, course
rigor, curriculum diversity, or other intangibles such as
working
part-time or high student activity responsibilities. Most admissions committees
value a minimum threshold score on the LSAT, and while they may admit a candidate with
a higher LSAT and a lower grade profile, they are less likely to admit a
candidate with a lower LSAT and a higher grade profile.
Taking and interpreting the LSAT
The LSAT has been changed a number of times over the
last two decades. Most recently it consists of five 35-minute sections of
multiple-choice questions. Four of the five sections contribute to the test
taker's score. The unscored (fifth) section, commonly referred to as the variable
section, typically is used to pretest new test questions. The placement of this
section will vary. A 35-minute writing sample is administered at the end of the
test, however LSAC does not score the writing sample, but rather sends copies of
the writing sample to all law schools to which you apply.
The LSAT is designed to measure skills
that are considered essential for success in law school: the
reading and comprehension of complex texts with accuracy and
insight; the organization and management of information and
the ability to draw reasonable inferences from it; the
ability to think critically; and the analysis and evaluation
of the reasoning and arguments of others. The three types of
multiple-choice questions in the LSAT are:
- Questions Testing Reading
Comprehension - These questions measure the ability
to read, with understanding and insight, examples of
lengthy and complex materials similar to those commonly
encountered in law school. The Reading Comprehension
section contains four sets of reading questions, each
consisting of a selection of reading material, followed
by five to eight questions that test reading and
reasoning abilities.
- Questions Testing
Analytical Reasoning - These questions measure the
ability to understand a structure of relationships and
to draw logical conclusions about that structure. You
are asked to reason deductively from a set of statements
and rules or principles that describe relationships
among persons, things, or events. Analytical Reasoning
questions reflect the kinds of complex analyses that a
law student performs in the course of legal problem
solving.
- Questions Testing Logical
Reasoning - These questions assess the ability to
analyze, critically evaluate, and complete arguments as
they occur in ordinary language. Each Logical Reasoning
question requires the test taker to read and comprehend
a short passage, then answer a question about it. The
questions are designed to assess a wide range of skills
involved in thinking critically, with an emphasis on
skills that are central to legal reasoning. These skills
include drawing well-supported conclusions, reasoning by
analogy, determining how additional evidence affects an
argument, applying principles or rules, and identifying
argument flaws.
Most importantly, the sections are not testing your
knowledge but rather your reasoning skills under time constraints. Half
of the test is devoted to logical reasoning, and repetitious practicing of
sample tests, and perhaps taking a course in logic may help
you prepare. The
online site
My LSAT Test
provides a comprehensive walk-through of the exam, its various sections, sample
exams, and test-taking strategies.
Law schools strongly urge you take the first
LSAT
offered in the testing cycle, usually June between your junior and
senior
years, and make application during the fall of your senior year. Scores from the June LSAT
will be sent to you by early August, allowing
you several alternative courses of action:
-
If your score is good (80th
percentile and
above), you may spend the fall considering which schools to apply to, weighing
the advantages and disadvantages of each. See the section on strategizing below.
-
If your score is average to marginal
(50th-60th
percentile), you may want to retake the exam to see if you can do
better.
Some who retake the LSAT do better, most don't - most simply duplicate their
previous score and some even score lower! Some law schools average LSAT
scores for those who retake, some simply take the highest score. For those law
schools
that establish a minimum LSAT score for consideration, you might want
to
retake the LSAT just to shoot for that minimum. Approximately 35
ABA-approved
law schools consider the 45th-60th percentile range, but few are in the
mid-Atlantic region and few in
Pennsylvania
tend to consider applicants with lower than 60th percentile.
There
are a large number of law schools in the Mid-Atlantic region that would
consider LSAT scores in the 50th-60th percentile competitive. Again, see the
section on strategizing and the lawschoolpredictor site (linked below).
-
If your score is lower than 50th
percentile,
you should definitely consider retaking the LSAT, attempting to achieve
a big jump in your score - this has been done by some
students,
but most simply duplicate their first score within one or two
points.
You should also consider taking a LSAT preparation course (e.g. Kaplan) before
retaking the exam, or alternatively redirecting your career options into other
fields,
including paralegal training.
I would be the first to admit that the LSAT may
not
indicate whether you are capable of doing law school work. Some
individuals
perform brilliantly on standardized exams and others do not. The
point is that the LSAT is what law school admissions committees use to
interpret the capabilities of potential first-year law students, as a
hedge
against trying to interpret different grade averages from different
undergraduate
colleges and universities.
Whether to go to law school, and if so,
which one?
Students with excellent qualifications and
students
with marginal qualifications always end up asking the same question at
the end - which school do I really want to go to? For students with highly
competitive qualifications,
the choices are wider, and they should consider such things as (a) size
of student body, (b) availability of specialty courses, (c) opportunity
for work experience while in school, (d) placement patterns for
graduates,
and (e) sheer cost. Also a major consideration: the setting and climate
of the law school -- Is it small and self-contained? Is it within a
major
state university? Is it in a warm clime? Is it near the shore? Does it have good snow
for skiing? These may seem frivolous issues, but remember, you'll be
there
for three years - this is a major relocation. For this reason, I
strongly urge you to visit each school in which you have a serious
interest while it is in session, talk to
faculty and students, get a feel for each place before you make a
decision.
Students with less competitive qualifications
should not be dismayed, since a number of good law schools will
consider
them competitive. While their options definitely will be narrower,
there
are more than 150 accredited law schools in the United States, and
several
are looking for students with those qualifications. This is even more the
case in recent years as the law market has shrunk noticeably and fewer college
graduates are taking the LSAT or applying to law schools. Law school enrollments
have dropped an estimated 20 per cent in size as fewer students matriculate,
especially in the less competitive schools (the top 25 are still full and have
hefty
waiting lists), and law schools have responded in three ways: (1) to expand the
marketability of their graduates by offering more skills- and experience-based
courses in the curriculum, (2) by reducing the size of the entering freshman
class, thus making admission more competitive in those schools, and/or (3) they
have reduced the baseline numbers on minimally-acceptable LSAT scores and grade
averages, thus making admission possible if not likely in some schools that five
years ago would have rejected their admission outright.
To turn away from law school because "the market is
terrible" implies you are making the choice of graduate study direction based on
what the market for its graduates will be 3-5 years in the future. How can we
know that? If you really want to study law, and many still do, then by all means
explore it - carefully - and do not artificially narrow your options. More often
than
not, a student artificially narrows the schools he/she is interested in for
non-academic reasons peculiar to
him/her, e.g. by having a preference for staying close to home, having a life-long dream
of
attending a particular school, etc. On occasion, I have seen a student
who
wanted to stay in-state apply only to Pittsburgh, Dickinson, Duquesne,
and
Temple, and then get rejected at all of them, never once considering schools in
neighboring states or outside the region at which his/her chances for admission
were much better. If there are only certain law schools you are willing to
consider, then you may get yourself into a box if you don't gain admission and
don't have a fall-back position. The question becomes - do you want
to go to law school or only go to a particular law school? Look
around!
There are many good law schools in many parts of the United States.
Finally, the law schools you apply to should
be
reasonable
choices. Applying to a law school that is far beyond the range of your
credentials is often a waste of your time (filling out applications), the time
of professors (from whom you request recommendation letters), and money (each
application must be accompanied by an application processing fee which some schools waive to attract application by more
competitive students). Carefully consider whether you would actually
attend
the law schools to which you apply - if you are accepted at Yale or
Penn,
are you prepared to actually matriculate and bear the costs of law school education there over
three
years? And if not, why are you applying -- just to see if you can get in? Be
prepared to justify your choices to professors and parents since they
are
the ones bearing some of the burden of your applications.
Selection of which law schools to apply to is
a tricky
business. Reputation, cost, location, size are all considerations. Curriculum is
also a key variable - all law schools offer the same basic core of courses, but
what else do they offer, particularly in the second and third years? If you
really do your homework, some factors will often stand out, including:
-
State universities. Major state universities,
supported by annual appropriations from state taxpayers, tend to set aside a
large portion of their seats in the freshman class for in-state students. A
casual look at the admission profile of law schools like the University of
Texas or the University of Illinois may reveal only moderate competitiveness
of the average admit
- a range in which you may consider yourself very competitive. But the
overall profile does not reveal the profile of accepted out-of-state
students, who are vying for a much smaller number of seats and for which the
competition is more intense. Also notice if there is a tuition differential between in-state and
out-of-state students. The same is true of state-supported private
universities, such as the University of Pittsburgh or Penn State
-
Tuition and financial aid. Like it or
not,
this is a major if not the major consideration for most students. Tuition and fees at most law
schools are very expensive, in addition to which there are
incidental costs (such as room and board, books, etc.) and, assuming
you will be a full-time student (not working part-time), you are easily in
the $45,000 + range per year. Rounding up, it may cost you $150,000
to complete three years of law school at a public university. Is there
financial aid available? Yes, but less often for freshmen students than for
upperclassmen. Your chances for financial aid
increase as your credentials - especially your LSAT score - rise above the
average for a school's projected freshman class, i.e. if you are applying to a less
competitive law school. Other sources of financial aid for first-year law
students typically include parents and loans (many students
are already burdened by loans from their undergraduate degree program). If you are seeking admission to
law at a private university, expect tuition and fees to be higher than for an in-state public
university. And don't forget room, board and books.
-
Specialties. Students often want to know if a
law school specializes in an area of law they are interested in, e.g.
international, communication, environmental, or intellectual property law
(these
are ‘hot' these days). The truth is that the curriculum in your first two
years in law school is fairly set, and unless you become enamored with civil
procedure, property, or contract law, course selection to follow your
interests must await third year electives. Even then, selecting a law school
based on availability of course work in a specialty area requires some
in-depth investigation. Since most law schools offer some course work in
many specialty areas, do your homework! Does a law school have courses in
the specialty area? Does it publish a journal in that area? Does it have a
Center or Joint Center in which research in that area is conducted? Does it
have an outreach program in which one can gain practical experience prior to
graduation? Such
homework, dutifully done, would reveal that about a number of law schools really focus on
environmental
issues and some really specialize in
communications
law. Additional information in these areas has been provided on this website
via the
links.
-
Intangibles. Smaller and private law
schools
are very competitive, yet sometimes accept a few more marginally
competitive
applicants who might give their freshman class diversity in background,
e.g. it may seem attractive to an admissions committee that an
applicant is
from a small town in Western Pennsylvania as opposed to larger city, or is in
the dance ensemble, or participated in missionary projects.
-
Transfers. Law schools accept a few
students
transferring in after completing their freshman year elsewhere, but not many. It
is however an option to consider if you are not accepted at your most preferred
law school
outright.
-
Practice. Most undergraduates do not look
beyond admission to law school, setting as their goal simply 'getting in.'
They seldom consider in which fields of law they might
practice, or where. This is not unusual, since most undergraduates are not
savvy to the fields of study or practice in law. A table identifying where
Pitt-Johnstown political science graduates received their juris doctor
degree and where then ended up practicing law is attached
here.
-
Placement rates. In their promotional
materials, law schools often showcase their most stellar graduates and
typically report employment placement rates in general terms based on
surveys of recent graduation classes. Be
careful how you read these reports - reports are almost always based on
informal surveys returned by graduates, usually the 25-30% of graduates in any given
class who are happy to report good placement. So a 96% placement rate may
reflect 96% of the 25% who self-reported. That is still accurate, but not
necessarily the whole picture and casual readers may read too much into the
reports and think that law school somehow guarantees good post-graduation
placement. In fact, graduate placement
in law is very highly competitive, and the key to successful placement may
be top grades and significant practical experience gained in law school,
e.g. externships, certificates in certain practical fields, etc. This type
of credentialism has become in most cases a deciding factor in hirings.
It is fairly well-known that many new law graduates take part-time or law-related
researching or documenting positions for
an interim period before finding a permanent position - perhaps for a year
or more - and those are also
considered law-related placements. Generally new graduates find the job-hunting tough,
especially if they are less mobile, i.e. want to stay only within a certain
area or region. Stories are rife of law school graduates driving taxicabs in
New York City rather than looking for career opportunities away from the
City. In the last few years, the nadir of the job market for law school
graduates after the
bust of 2008, there have been many reports of law school graduates with
significant indebtedness and either not being well-placed or placed in a
non-legal position - this puts them in a grave financial bind and often
embittered, mainly toward the law school. So be aware that a law school
promises to
prepare you for legal placement, i.e. you will be appropriately trained,
but cannot promise placement not to mention good placement or placement in
the city of your preference, etc. Given the economic downturn and the
general shrinkage in employment in
the legal profession since 2008, and the resulting high competitiveness facing those
seeking to gain their first job, your best strategy is to seek a law
curriculum that will train you well and given you a diversity of practical
experience that will be attractive in the job market. Have Pitt-Johnstown
graduates who have completed law school in the past three years gotten jobs
and are practicing law in Pennsylvania? The answer is yes.
The Pitt-Johnstown record of law
school
acceptance
We have had a good record of law school admissions for
those students applying to schools at which they are competitive. Are
Pitt-Johnstown students competitive for law school admissions? The answer is yes.
The table below will give you an idea of the range of law schools that have
offered admission to Pitt-Johnstown graduates and each successful applicant's LSAT percentile:
Law schools that have admitted Pitt-Johnstown
graduates
1975-2016*
36th-52nd % 53rd-80th % 80th+ %
Delaware
State Pittsburgh Northeastern
Dayton Duquesne Virginia
Toledo Dickinson/PennState Pennsylvania
Ohio
Northern American Texas
Tulsa Syracuse Notre Dame
Thomas
Cooley Florida Harvard
California
Western Temple Hastings (CA)
Widener Commonwealth Columbia Georgetown
Akron Wake
Forest Duke
Case Western Reserve Michigan
Washington and
Lee Cornell
Richmond
Albany
Suffolk
New England
Western New England
*listed by applicant's LSAT percentile
in the year the test was taken
An appropriate timetable
for
applying to law schools
In June during the summer prior to your senior year
The best strategy is to take the LSAT in the summer
(June)
sitting. Registration for
the current cycle (June through the following April) LSAT is available
on-line at
www.lsac.org, the mega-site for
the
Law School Admission Council (LSAC). The mechanics of how
to
register for the exam and for LSAC's Credential Assembly Service (CAS) are all explained on that website. When you register for the LSAT,
you can also register for the CAS and send them an official transcript of your grades
through end of junior year. CAS will also compile your letters of
recommendation
as well. If your grades are not as high as you would hope by the end of
your junior year but you believe the fall semester grades from your
senior year will improve your application, do not send your transcript
in until after fall semester grades are posted. CAS will automatically respond
to any law school to which you have applied and send your Report. So be
prepared for the costs of application -- $180 for LSAT, $175 for CAS, and $30
each for reports sent to law schools, not counting application fees charged by
individual schools.
Note that LSAT preparation courses, which basically walk you through the mechanics of the
exam, the logic behind each of the sections of questions, how to
prepare
for and anticipate answering these types of questions, and a series of
practice exams, are very useful, but most area universities no longer offer such courses.
You have several options. First and easiest, check out the LSAT questions
site linked above - this is a good place to start, as it will expose
you to the types of questions you will see. Second, if you want to
make the investment, the best, most intensive prep course is offered by Kaplan (or check out
PowerScore ) but
it tends to be expensive. Students have reported that the Princeton
Review prepares one for basic levels of competitiveness but not at the higher levels, especially in
certain sections of the LSAT. Third, you can also study from old LSAT exams
available from the LSAC site (Official LSAT PrepTests in four
versions) or in books sold commercially (like Barron's). One
recent graduate reported great success in checking the message board at
www.top-law-schools.com for help in preparing for the LSAT, gauging
which prep courses might be most useful, etc. Remember, your LSAT score will
largely dictate where and even if you gain admission - preparing for the
LSAT is therefore critical to good placement. The more you are committed to
preparing for the LSAT, the better the outcome is likely to be.
Also, if it is not possible for you to
take
the June LSAT (you may be participating in a study abroad program or
working full-time), you can simply register for the September exam. If you put
off taking the LSAT until December or February, you risk not getting your
score back soon enough to adjust your school options or to plan to retake
the exam. Also, most law schools have 'rolling admissions,' meaning they
admit students progressively starting usually in December or January. If you
delay taking (or retaking) the LSAT until February or later, the number of seats
available shrinks and the competitiveness for them increases. In certain
circumstances, a 'lag' year may be appropriate, i.e. sitting out the year after
graduation to study for a retake of the LSAT, optimally with a prep course.
In August at the start of your senior year
Carefully consider your LSAT score and the
kinds
of law schools it may qualify you for. If you want to retake the
LSAT in October, check the deadlines for that in early September. If your LSAT score is satisfactory to you,
consider the various law schools you may be interested in by looking at
their recent catalogs on-line and begin strategizing your application process (below). You may also want to purchase the ABA-LSAC Official
Guide to ABA-Approved Law
Schools with your LSAT registration. All the information in the
Guide
is actually available on-line, including LSAT and
grade
average profiles from each school's most recently admitted freshman
class,
allowing you to check how competitive your own profile is against
their
pattern of admissions. You can then cross-reference this information
against
each law school's website, which can be directly accessed through the LSAC
link mentioned before. You can also refer to the ‘geographical guide'
in
the Guide, a series of regional maps of all law schools across the
country, and make a list of law schools that match your interests and
qualifications, and their admissions minimums. At
this point you will also want to write
to or email each of the law schools on your select list and request for
information, applications, and financial aid opportunities. You may
discover
that on-line application may qualify you for a waiver of the usual
application
fee.
There are three useful on-line sources of information that will greatly assist you
in strategizing at which law schools you might have a
better chance of admission. The first is
www.top-law-schools.com, mentioned above. It gives you access to a full
range of information on individual law schools. Second, a good provider of
admissions profiles (numbers, rankings, graphs of applicants recently admitted,
etc.) for each law school in which you might have an interest is
www.lawschoolnumbers.com. If you do your homework on this site, you can get
a fairly accurate profile or pattern of admissions qualifications, especially at
the margins. Finally, check out
www.lawschoolpredictor.com, a site that allows you to calculate your LSAC
standardized grade point average and enter it with your LSAT score into a
databank that will then list a probable decision from each law school, ranging
from DENY, to WEAK CONSIDER, to CONSIDER, to STRONGLY CONSIDER, to ADMIT. Be
careful how you read these listings - a school that comes up "strongly consider"
is not a guarantee that it may admit you, nor is it a guarantee that you may be
remotely interested in attending that school. Again, do your homework on schools
you believe are in your range and consider their tangibles and intangibles. And
do not necessarily confine your range to just the 'best bets' - if a school is
listed as "weak consider" but in many respects is very desirable from your own
point of view, put it on your short list anyway.
In November of your senior year
Winnow your list of potential law schools down to 8-10 that
cover
a range between 'probable' or 'sure-bet' acceptance (see above) to those at which
you have a more marginal chance.
Process your application forms to a range of those schools, and identify them to
CAS
to have your credentials sent to them. Personally solicit letters of
recommendation from appropriate faculty and others - two or three at most. Most
law schools accept letters only through CAS, so letter-writers will be
electronically uploading
their recommendation letters addressed "To whom it may concern" directly to CAS rather than to each law school individually. Try to
have all
this done and your own application forms sent in by Thanksgiving if
possible.
Several cautions:
-
If you have already narrowed your choices down
geographically to only a few schools (e.g. you want to be in or near
Pittsburgh), be sure to consider applying to a ‘safety value' school outside
that area just in case. Do not however apply to 8-10 schools if you plan to
only attend one particular one anyway -
that
is a waste of everyone's time and your own (application fee) money.
-
Application forms to law schools are all pretty much
the same - all want basic information and most want you to write one or two
narrative (personal) essays
on subjects ranging from ‘why you want to study of law' to ‘other
considerations
the admissions committee should take into account'. These essays are very
important - they are an opportunity to make your case, to demonstrate
seriousness,
or at least to show the admissions committee you are literate and
articulate.
Do not blow these essays off; do not treat them
casually.
Sloppy, care-less essays are likely to move your application into the
‘wait'
or ‘refuse' piles. If you are applying online, these essays will have to
be prepared ahead of time and uploaded to the application site. The top-law-schools site (above) provides you access to
others who will help you prepare your personal statement. Applying
on-line will insure some level of neatness, as long as you proof-read the
application before you click "send".
- Also, letters of recommendation are used by
admissions
committees to give texture to your grade profile. The committee already knows
your
grades - they have your transcript. What they want to know is what the
grades mean - the rigor of the courses completed, distinguishing
academic
work or projects, etc. So, who should write your letters? The answer is
as
simple as it is reasonable - faculty who are familiar with and can
discuss
your work and your abilities in some detail, faculty who have read
analytical essays or papers submitted and/or have seen your presentations
or supervised your individual projects; in short, faculty who really know
you. Try to anticipate what a faculty member might write to an
admissions committee. If your best realistic anticipation is that the letter that
looks something like
"Susan
took my class and got an A, but other than that I don't know anything
about
her" - that type of letter will be meaningless. Letters from
friends of the family, attorneys you've known in the community, or others
outside academe may be generally useful to vouch for your character, but
cannot provide clues about your academic
capability.
- And, when you ask a faculty member to write
a letter, provide him/her with a list of all schools at the same time.
When you ask, you should provide (a) your grade profile overall and in the
major, usually on a resume that includes significant academic achievements
and extra-curricular activities, and (b) your LSAT score. Most letters of recommendation are sent directly to
CAS as a generic form, and sent from there to the law schools you designate. If a cover sheet is necessary, provide it up
front, and be sure to sign it. Do this by November - do not rush at the last
minute and expect faculty members to write a thoughtful letter 'on the
quick.'
In January in your senior year
In the first week of January, it might be a good
idea to phone CAS to verify your application file is complete and has
been sent
to those schools you requested. You could contact the Admissions
Office of those schools you are most interested in to verify that your
file has been received and is complete. Most schools will
not (on their own initiative) notify you one way or the other, and will not
even consider your application
until
it is complete. Often the missing item is a letter of recommendation. The
burden is yours to be sure the application is complete and ready for the
admissions committee to consider.
During March of your senior year
Admissions committees will let you know as soon as a decision is made.
Some will do so early (sometimes in
January or February)
if they use rolling admissions for those who clearly above a school's
minimum threshold for admission based on a composite LSAT and GPA score.
Other programs start their admissions consideration process in February or early
March. Marginal applicants usually have to wait -- often until May, June or even
July, and during that time they may receive a 'wait-list' notification or no communication from the law school at
all.
If you are offered admission to a law school, you will be given a
deadline
for accepting and submitting a matriculation deposit (usually
in the $300 range) to hold your spot.
If you are put on a wait-list at a school you prefer to the one that has already
admitted you and asked for a deposit, then putting the deposit down is an insurance
policy - a wait-list school may admit you in August, weeks before you re
scheduled to start classes at the other school.
The role of the prelaw
adviser
The prelaw adviser at Pitt-Johnstown provides a number
of
services, mostly in the area of counseling. He counsels all
undergraduates
on a walk-in basis during the academic year, juniors preparing to
register
for the LSAT and considering LSAT preparation courses, and seniors
selecting
law schools to which they will apply. All students registering for the
LSAT will be asked on their registration form if they wish their LSAT score sent
to their Pitt-Johnstown prelaw Adviser as well, and many say 'yes', and a few
(perhaps
fearing the embarrassment of a possible low LSAT score or simply not wanting
anyone to know they are applying) say 'no'.
There are two
types of critical advising the prelaw adviser can provide involve:
(1)
how a student can adjust his/her undergraduate course selection to build
skills
that will serve him/her well either in the LSAT itself or in first-year law
school. This would ordinarily include
emphasizing courses of analytical reading and extensive writing, considering
extra-mural (off-campus) academic experiences, especially study abroad, and being extremely
academically conscientious - not just 'getting by' with grades that are 'good
enough.'
(2)
which law schools fit the student's competitiveness profile, or
even their social comfort level. Regardless of one's 'life-long dream' of
attending one law school or another, law schools have a competitiveness
threshold they adhere to fairly strictly. While competitiveness has lessened a
bit in the past five years, it varies from school to school and students will be
advised to consider each school carefully in terms of competitiveness, location,
social fit, and sheer cost. In many cases, the prelaw Adviser is not a student's
academic or major adviser and students should seek him out.
A final caution - the prelaw adviser is simply an adviser - he does not
have all the answers and cannot do the homework for you. He can show you where
to look and advise you what to consider. But the basic choices rest with you.
Finally, any good prelaw adviser has an obligation to be candid
with students, not merely along the lines of how competitive or noncompetitive
they may be, but also and perhaps more importantly giving close scrutiny to a
student's motivation in wanting to attend law school. Even among the most
generally competitive (top) students, law school is not for everyone. It
is a three-year vocational training that is, as many graduates would admit, a
grind and rarely exciting or philosophical.
All students, and especially those who have aspired to law school admission
for years, should also consider other options - not as a fallback but as an actual
career direction.
The prelaw adviser at Pitt-Johnstown is:
Dr. James R. Alexander
Office: Krebs 104
Phone: 814-269-2983
Email: zander@pitt.edu
August 2017